their close alliances with the ';Hollywood Croud';. Do the Republicans really need or want yet another Hollywood croud guy like Fred Thompson or Ronald ReaGUN running for El Presidente? I mean wouldn't be yet another example of the hypocray of the Republican Party?Since the Republicans always rant and rave against Democrats for?
Good point. It would have been stronger without the cute spelling but it's valid none the less.Since the Republicans always rant and rave against Democrats for?
All politicians are hypocritical; DUMBocrat and REGURGican.
It's because of the Hollywood crowd they are running with are liberals who are so antiBush and America that some of them actually go to our enemies and bash the country with them. Then you have idiots like Michael Moore who likes to trash the country to the whole world. These Hollywood republicans would never do that!
I am a Democrat, but I personally don't care if the candidate is in with the Hollywood crowd or not, just as long as the candidate is experienced enough and have all the right skills to be president.
How does the Republican support of a conservative who happens to be an actor amount to hypocrisy? Most of Hollywood are liberals who support socialist causes that are near and dear to Democrats. They use their notoriety and public position to push those ideas, which is what conservatives disagree with.
Hypocray?..........Croud?..........Would鈥?be yet?.........Son.......you shouldnt have dripped out of skewl.
As someone said, ';Hypocracy is the tribute vice pays to virtue.'; It's all just rhetoric. Republicans bloviate about ';family values'; and then have furtive sex in public restrooms. Democrats decry the ';evil rich'; while squirreling away vast fortunes via insider trading deals. It's all just for show.
I would disagree with you on that one!!!!
Fred doesn't need the Hollywood crowd, just the smart crowd. I don't think he's part of the Hollywood in crowd anyway, but he knows his stuff on politics.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment